<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.2" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Conventional solution for the visitors + AclComponent</title>
	<link>http://myeasyscripts.com/loudbaking/conventional-solution-for-the-visitors-aclcomponent/</link>
	<description>Specialty cuisines: app development, internet marketing and entrepreneurship</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2008 01:53:11 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: Luke</title>
		<link>http://myeasyscripts.com/loudbaking/conventional-solution-for-the-visitors-aclcomponent/#comment-389</link>
		<author>Luke</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Feb 2008 11:16:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://myeasyscripts.com/loudbaking/conventional-solution-for-the-visitors-aclcomponent/#comment-389</guid>
		<description>hi, just been reading through some of your excellent cake posts. This is a nice idea, and you cuold possibly add to the convention side of it by setting a Config::write() directive of the prefix to look for in the regex, so it behaves a little more like the admin routing (where you can prepend whatever prefix you choose). 

thanks a lot for your blog - liked the validation section very much too, it was helpful. Had you thought of adding some of the content to the Cake Book (wiki thing) now?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hi, just been reading through some of your excellent cake posts. This is a nice idea, and you cuold possibly add to the convention side of it by setting a Config::write() directive of the prefix to look for in the regex, so it behaves a little more like the admin routing (where you can prepend whatever prefix you choose). </p>
<p>thanks a lot for your blog - liked the validation section very much too, it was helpful. Had you thought of adding some of the content to the Cake Book (wiki thing) now?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sam S</title>
		<link>http://myeasyscripts.com/loudbaking/conventional-solution-for-the-visitors-aclcomponent/#comment-381</link>
		<author>Sam S</author>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Feb 2008 03:25:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://myeasyscripts.com/loudbaking/conventional-solution-for-the-visitors-aclcomponent/#comment-381</guid>
		<description>wow! thanks for this insightful post</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>wow! thanks for this insightful post</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jad</title>
		<link>http://myeasyscripts.com/loudbaking/conventional-solution-for-the-visitors-aclcomponent/#comment-84</link>
		<author>Jad</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Oct 2007 05:45:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://myeasyscripts.com/loudbaking/conventional-solution-for-the-visitors-aclcomponent/#comment-84</guid>
		<description>Thanks for dropping by Geoff. This definitely saves lots of queries, I am going to be use it for 'visitors' and 'subscribers', both part of parent 'Guests' but with a couple different permissions.

Jad</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for dropping by Geoff. This definitely saves lots of queries, I am going to be use it for &#8216;visitors&#8217; and &#8217;subscribers&#8217;, both part of parent &#8216;Guests&#8217; but with a couple different permissions.</p>
<p>Jad</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Geoff Ford</title>
		<link>http://myeasyscripts.com/loudbaking/conventional-solution-for-the-visitors-aclcomponent/#comment-83</link>
		<author>Geoff Ford</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Oct 2007 03:23:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://myeasyscripts.com/loudbaking/conventional-solution-for-the-visitors-aclcomponent/#comment-83</guid>
		<description>This is a very elegant solution, and I like the convention over configuration as well. 

I think that this method for simple group based access may be much more efficent than ACL as it removes a ton of DB queries.

Geoff</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a very elegant solution, and I like the convention over configuration as well. </p>
<p>I think that this method for simple group based access may be much more efficent than ACL as it removes a ton of DB queries.</p>
<p>Geoff</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
