<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.2" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: CakePHP URL validation bug fix and enhancement</title>
	<link>http://myeasyscripts.com/loudbaking/cakephp-url-validation-bug-fix-and-enhancement/</link>
	<description>Specialty cuisines: app development, internet marketing and entrepreneurship</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 23:23:43 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: Jad</title>
		<link>http://myeasyscripts.com/loudbaking/cakephp-url-validation-bug-fix-and-enhancement/#comment-386</link>
		<author>Jad</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Feb 2008 17:20:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://myeasyscripts.com/loudbaking/cakephp-url-validation-bug-fix-and-enhancement/#comment-386</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;@James: at the pace Cake is being developed, I personally think it's better to stick with just one version (preferably a stable one) until the next stable is released. Not long ago, the 1.2 stable was released, so pre-beta is already old news ;)&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@James: at the pace Cake is being developed, I personally think it&#8217;s better to stick with just one version (preferably a stable one) until the next stable is released. Not long ago, the 1.2 stable was released, so pre-beta is already old news <img src='http://myeasyscripts.com/loudbaking/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James</title>
		<link>http://myeasyscripts.com/loudbaking/cakephp-url-validation-bug-fix-and-enhancement/#comment-382</link>
		<author>James</author>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Feb 2008 20:49:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://myeasyscripts.com/loudbaking/cakephp-url-validation-bug-fix-and-enhancement/#comment-382</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;@Jad - Elliot commented on using pre-beta code on a production site. Do you think it's a good idea? It tends to not be as well tested as it could be ;)&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Jad - Elliot commented on using pre-beta code on a production site. Do you think it&#8217;s a good idea? It tends to not be as well tested as it could be <img src='http://myeasyscripts.com/loudbaking/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jad</title>
		<link>http://myeasyscripts.com/loudbaking/cakephp-url-validation-bug-fix-and-enhancement/#comment-156</link>
		<author>Jad</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Dec 2007 00:18:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://myeasyscripts.com/loudbaking/cakephp-url-validation-bug-fix-and-enhancement/#comment-156</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;@Elliot: The fix was implemented in the pre-beta version. I mention that at the top of the post in the 'Update' section - maybe you missed that ;)&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Elliot: The fix was implemented in the pre-beta version. I mention that at the top of the post in the &#8216;Update&#8217; section - maybe you missed that <img src='http://myeasyscripts.com/loudbaking/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Elliot</title>
		<link>http://myeasyscripts.com/loudbaking/cakephp-url-validation-bug-fix-and-enhancement/#comment-151</link>
		<author>Elliot</author>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Dec 2007 01:02:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://myeasyscripts.com/loudbaking/cakephp-url-validation-bug-fix-and-enhancement/#comment-151</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Do you use the pre-beta version of CakePHP on production sites?&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I’m using the latest stable (1.1.18.5850), and it doesn’t look like it supports any of your code here, does it?&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Do you use the pre-beta version of CakePHP on production sites?</p>

<p>I’m using the latest stable (1.1.18.5850), and it doesn’t look like it supports any of your code here, does it?</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jad</title>
		<link>http://myeasyscripts.com/loudbaking/cakephp-url-validation-bug-fix-and-enhancement/#comment-121</link>
		<author>Jad</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Nov 2007 10:40:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://myeasyscripts.com/loudbaking/cakephp-url-validation-bug-fix-and-enhancement/#comment-121</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;@adam: sorry for the delay and thanks for dropping by.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;This regex was already implemented in the latest pre-beta release of CakePHP - you don't need to manually do it anymore.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@adam: sorry for the delay and thanks for dropping by.</p>

<p>This regex was already implemented in the latest pre-beta release of CakePHP - you don&#8217;t need to manually do it anymore.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam D</title>
		<link>http://myeasyscripts.com/loudbaking/cakephp-url-validation-bug-fix-and-enhancement/#comment-110</link>
		<author>Adam D</author>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Nov 2007 06:48:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://myeasyscripts.com/loudbaking/cakephp-url-validation-bug-fix-and-enhancement/#comment-110</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Seems like the regEx is broken, as it is giving me errors when I perform the validation.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;[code]Parse error: syntax error, unexpected '@', expecting ')' in /app/app_model.php on line 58[/code]&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The actual line in my file is:
[code]'path' =&#62; '[w-.,'@?^=%&#38;:;/~+#]*[w-@?^=%&#38;/~+#]',[/code]&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Let me know if you can fix it, would love to use it!&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Seems like the regEx is broken, as it is giving me errors when I perform the validation.</p>

<p>[code]Parse error: syntax error, unexpected &#8216;@&#8217;, expecting &#8216;)&#8217; in /app/app_model.php on line 58[/code]</p>

<p>The actual line in my file is:
[code]&#8217;path&#8217; =&gt; &#8216;[w-.,&#8217;@?^=%&amp;:;/~+#]*[w-@?^=%&amp;/~+#]&#8217;,[/code]</p>

<p>Let me know if you can fix it, would love to use it!</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
